A Proposal of Evaluation Criteria and Framework Based on the Characteristics and Goals of Argumentative Scientific Writing

The purpose of this study was to suggest an evaluation criteria and framework for argumentative scientific writing activities based on the identification characteristics goals writing. First, were defined in three ways: thinking skill as arguments, content science, activity Second, five specified accordingly. goal ‘cultivating critical ability’ related characteristics, ‘understanding method’ both characteristics. knowledge’ ‘cultivation communication skills’ ‘development Third, according goals. Finally, consisting a three-level rating scale poor, average, excellent proposed using criteria. Based results, implications design implementation class discussed.